Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
1. FozzieSov and the future of entosising - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The largest effects of FozzieSov occurred before it was even implemented, right now most seem to simply be holding their breath... learning the ropes... and waiting for the first major player to make a move. When the first stress fractures in cur...
- by Ranger 1 - at 2015.08.01 01:32:09
|
2. Sticky:[New structures] Mooring and docking features - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I didn't realize there were any significant groups in game that didn't already know exactly where all enemy supers of interest are at any given point in time. Not really seeing an issue with "too much free intel" in this case. However, if you'...
- by Ranger 1 - at 2015.03.25 20:17:14
|
3. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
EvilweaselFinance wrote: Ranger 1 wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: davet517 wrote: I'll ask again, who, exactly, do you think they are going to do it to who cant return the favor in spades? . the optimistic fools who think that the c...
- by Ranger 1 - at 2015.03.09 22:01:21
|
4. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
EvilweaselFinance wrote: davet517 wrote: I'll ask again, who, exactly, do you think they are going to do it to who cant return the favor in spades? . the optimistic fools who think that the change means they can now have sov blocs will c...
- by Ranger 1 - at 2015.03.09 21:53:50
|
5. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: davet517 wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: If the change then happens and the big group then proceeds to do exactly what they warned they would, the dumb people who didn't heed the warning use it as another reason to hate th...
- by Ranger 1 - at 2015.03.09 21:50:32
|
6. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
EvilweaselFinance wrote: Eli Apol wrote: I'm using the maximum for effect - we can do 27minutes instead and still have a 29:12 ratio of time wasted by the trollceptor pilot versus the defender. Point still stands. edit: And just done with ...
- by Ranger 1 - at 2015.03.09 21:39:38
|
7. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Arrendis wrote: PotatoOverdose wrote: For the basic Math challenged: Ceptor is on minute 38 of his sov lazor. Maulus warps in, damps, warps off. Ceptor never picks up sov lazor again. For the basic math challenged: 40 minutes requires So...
- by Ranger 1 - at 2015.03.09 21:33:37
|
8. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
EvilweaselFinance wrote: Ranger 1 wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: M1k3y Koontz wrote: 45 DPS at 124km, your interceptor is dead in under a minute (55.5 seconds, yes I did the math) It's also a fifth the cost. Your move. Also, yes...
- by Ranger 1 - at 2015.03.09 21:27:21
|
9. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
EvilweaselFinance wrote: M1k3y Koontz wrote: 45 DPS at 124km, your interceptor is dead in under a minute (55.5 seconds, yes I did the math) It's also a fifth the cost. Your move. Also, yes it has remote sebos. If you can't get two guys...
- by Ranger 1 - at 2015.03.09 21:14:33
|
10. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Promiscuous Female wrote: Eli Apol wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: i move to another objective Good, meanwhile I recap this one at upto 4x the speed because of my defensive indices. So you're against a 4x timer as well remember? oka...
- by Ranger 1 - at 2015.03.09 20:08:56
|
11. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Promiscuous Female wrote: Ranger 1 wrote: I'm sorry, WHAT? Okay, I'll be gentle. Let me refresh your memory. Quote: I'll quit yanking your chain now, because yes, you make it easy. However you posted this... Quote: because if we ...
- by Ranger 1 - at 2015.03.09 20:06:44
|
12. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Promiscuous Female wrote: Ranger 1 wrote: Glad to hear it. Not that you did of course... as that was far from it's primary point. But you knew that already didn't you? A little secret... so does everyone else. nah, your post was "you...
- by Ranger 1 - at 2015.03.09 19:54:47
|
13. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Promiscuous Female wrote: Ranger 1 wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: Ranger 1 wrote: However, if you continue to pose your arguments as : We want good fights. this is where you've lost the thread at no point is goonswarm federatio...
- by Ranger 1 - at 2015.03.09 18:56:11
|
14. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Promiscuous Female wrote: Ranger 1 wrote: However, if you continue to pose your arguments as : We want good fights. this is where you've lost the thread at no point is goonswarm federation interested in good fights defense of our empi...
- by Ranger 1 - at 2015.03.09 18:51:25
|
15. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I'll quit yanking your chain now, because yes, you make it easy. However you posted this... Quote: because if we can reduce the headache for us and make the system actually livable for people who are not us we achieve what we in the biz like ...
- by Ranger 1 - at 2015.03.09 18:29:03
|
16. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Promiscuous Female wrote: Ranger 1 wrote: So.... your area of control shrinks to something manageable and the downside is that you get lots more good fights close to home with people you've likely never seen before? For other folks they get...
- by Ranger 1 - at 2015.03.09 18:09:11
|
17. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
EvilweaselFinance wrote: Ranger 1 wrote: So.... your area of control shrinks to something manageable and the downside is that you get lots more good fights close to home with people you've likely never seen before? we don't get fights wi...
- by Ranger 1 - at 2015.03.09 18:07:03
|
18. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Promiscuous Female wrote: Ranger 1 wrote: Point being, your entire organization doesn't need to be trying to kill interceptors constantly, just devote the necessary number of ships to keep an Entosis point on your important stuff. If you ca...
- by Ranger 1 - at 2015.03.09 18:04:14
|
19. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Amyclas Amatin wrote: MASSADEATH wrote: Does not seem too hard to counter this..just put your own entosis module on the structure...bam problem solved... or spread a fleet of sniping corms around the structure.... insta pop ceptors.... All...
- by Ranger 1 - at 2015.03.09 17:35:21
|
20. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Promiscuous Female wrote: Killian Cormac wrote: FT Diomedes wrote: Only the largest alliances really have a chance of holding even a single region when faced with opportunistic and agile enemies. If this isn't a design goal, it should...
- by Ranger 1 - at 2015.03.09 17:28:01
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |